




 |
|
 |
Millions of Dollars in Duty Refunds &
Savings for Importers
DISCLAIMER: CASE RESULTS DEPEND ON A VARIETY OF FACTORS UNIQUE TO
EACH CASE.
CASE RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE OR PREDICT A SIMILAR RESULT IN ANY FUTURE
CASE.
Millions
in duty refunds and savings generated for U.S. Importers.
 |
A high-tech ceramics company received over
$300,000 in duty refunds on
their imports of parts for semiconductor
production machines. |
 |
A steel importer received $2.4
million in duty refunds from
successful litigation resulting in exclusion
of its product from the scope of antidumping
and countervailing duty orders.
|
 |
An SUV importer received over $30
million in refunds based on
successful outcome of administrative tariff
classification dispute.
|
 |
A jewelry company received over
$400,000 in refunds on particular
types of watches pursuant to protest
challenging long-standing Customs practice.
|
 |
A flouropolymers company received duty
refunds of over $300,000.
|
 |
An importer of dried vegetables received
$600,000 in duty refunds
due to successful tariff classification
litigation. |
 |
An importer of plastic covered pile fabrics
has rate advance bills of over $2
million canceled due to
Headquarters reversal of NIS position.
|
 |
An importer of personal watercraft saves
$1.5 million annually due
to favorable tariff classification ruling.
|
 |
A steel importer saves over $300,000
in duties by resisting auditor's demands for
duty underpayments on liquidated entries.
|
 |
An importer of coated fabrics receives over
$100,000 in refunds due to
successful litigation contesting Customs'
position on tariff classification.
|
 |
An importer of steel discs receives over
$200,000 in refunds in
favorable court settlement of tariff
classification dispute with Customs.
|
 |
An importer of merchandise subject to
antidumping duty order receives over
$200,000 under favorable settlement
of court case challenging timeliness of
Customs duty assessment. |
 |
A cement importer receives over
$300,000 in refunds due to reversal
of initial decision finding product within
scope of antidumping duty order. |
|
|
|
The duty amounts noted above pertain to duties in specific transactions
subject to dispute. In most cases, when later import transactions are
taken into account, the actual duty savings are much higher and
sometimes many times higher than the noted amounts. Please refer
to Mr. Bowen's
Experience
page for additional examples. |
Contact:
Vincent Bowen, Esq.
2515 K Street, N.W.
Suite 101
Washington, DC 20037
Phone: 202.965.7159
vbowen@vbcustomslaw.com
102 West Monroe Avenue
Alexandria, Virginia 22301
Phone: 703.820.0191
vbowen@vbcustomslaw.com
For 20 years, Mr. Bowen has represented and advised importers on Customs
requirements applicable to their import transactions. Clients have
obtained millions of dollars in duty refunds in Customs disputes &
millions more in duty savings on later transactions.
Mr. Bowen has extensive experience in all major areas of Customs law,
including: HTSUS tariff classification, Customs audits, valuation,
country-of-origin marking, customs penalty defense, defense of
liquidated damages claims, bonded import programs (FTZ, warehouse, TIB),
& preferential duty programs (NAFTA, GSP, CBI,Chapter 98).


|